In one of my previous articles I wrote about how in terms of the past legislature, after divorce, the pension funds only had to pay to the ex-spouse in terms of a court order after the member of the fund died or retired. This legislature was amended so that the fund had to pay out within sixty days after the divorce was granted.
Wiese: Pension Fund wouldn't pay until ex dies or resigns
Certain government pension funds however still only paid out after death or resignation and one lady, Mrs. Wiese, challenged this from a constitutional viewpoint and judgment was recently awarded in her favour in the Cape High Court. Mathilda Wiese (45), of Malmesbury, had a divorce order entitling her to 50% of her ex-husband's pension. Her ex-husband had been a state official and the pension fund refused to pay out to her until death or resignation of her ex-husband.
Pension Fund Act does not apply to state pension funds
Wiese had divorced her ex-husband, a policeman, in 2009. The amendment to the Pension Fund Act only applied to funds controlled by the Pension Fund Act, and did not include pension funds for state officials. She applied in court against the Minister of Finance, the Pension Funds for State Officials and her ex-husband in 2009 and in July 2011 was awarded her share of her ex-husband's pension, in the sum of R294 808.
Unequal rights of spouses of state officials
In Wiese's court application she asked that the provisions of the Pension Fund Act be made applicable to government officials, so that she would be entitled to and be paid her money immediately. The judge in this case was Lee Bozalek. He decided that the Pension Fund Act was unconstitutional due to the fact that spouses of members of Government pension funds do not enjoy the same rights as spouses of members of other pension funds.
The government was instructed to change the legislature within 12 months. The order was also referred to the Constitutional Court to be ratified.
In my opinion this was the correct decision. The Act clearly discriminated unfairly between the government and other pension funds; which was unconstitutional. I see no reason why some spouses in our law had to wait to be paid out until their ex died or resigned, while others were paid out immediately.
This decision was a landmark decision. My practise received numerous queries regarding the outcome of the Wiese decision. Mrs Wiese is one of many people who would have been in this unfortunate position of not being paid out immediately.
Clean break divoces
I believe in a "clean break" post-divorce. If one must wait until death or resignation before being paid out your share of your ex's pension, this certainly is not a "clean break" from your ex, and this should be encouraged. This was a correct decision by the court in the Wiese case all in all.
Family, Estate & notarial legal services
Info on Divorces & Pension Fund assets
Alongside the house being lived in; holdings in pension funds are often the biggest assets in a divorce.
NB: Under the new 2 pot system law, you must formally notify your spouse's pension fund in writing about the divorce proceedings, along with providing proof. Once this notice is given, the pension fund is legally prohibited from permitting any withdrawals, loans, or guarantees without the consent of the non-member spouse.
Note that this is a public forum which is best treated the same as a public toilet - use at own risk. Anybody may ask and answer, and you don't know what their level of expertise is. No information on this website should be acted on without first consulting with a lawyer. Do not share private details here.